212frank wrote:Why is it so hard to understand? you and the flaming pink a-hole keep trying to say that there is some sort of vast voter repudiation of republicans when the difference between winning and losing is 2.52%. If you convert that to odds and apply it to the brain power you are demonstrating, its a 40:1 shot you and the a-hole will grasp this basic concept.
jtsound wrote:212frank wrote:Why is it so hard to understand? you and the flaming pink a-hole keep trying to say that there is some sort of vast voter repudiation of republicans when the difference between winning and losing is 2.52%. If you convert that to odds and apply it to the brain power you are demonstrating, its a 40:1 shot you and the a-hole will grasp this basic concept.
First of all, don't lump me in with the Buckster.
Second, that's not what I said.
Third, what is your point? Is a 2.5% margin not a legitimate win in your mind? Not big enough? Bush LOST the popular vote in 2000 but didn't have a problem starting 2 wars and enacting unfunded tax cuts that on both counts could be argued went a long way towards getting us into the deficit situation we are in at the moment. His margin in 2004 was less than Obama's 2.5 this year. So does that make his agenda and presidency less legitimate in your mind? Unlike the Buckster I'm not trying to pick a fight with you I just am trying to make some sense out of your problem with his margin of victory. It's a non-issue to everyone but you (and Bucky).
jtsound wrote:In if democrats are making it worse as they continually say then why do deficits consistently rise under their (republican) administrations and fall under democratic.
So Sweet wrote:I would personally like to thank all of you for not going near the term "reach across the aisle"
Bucky if it makes you feel better I probably took 2.4% of Franks wealth in free drinks and other riders during the Continental days.
bucky starburst wrote:So Sweet wrote:I would personally like to thank all of you for not going near the term "reach across the aisle"
Bucky if it makes you feel better I probably took 2.4% of Franks wealth in free drinks and other riders during the Continental days.
Excellent! I salute your liver and your thievery. I guess I do owe frank some gratitude. The Continental got me laid. More than once in fact, with a very attractive woman who had no communicable diseases. Thanks frank!!!! I miss those crazy goth witches and their pale undead allure. Where do they hang out now???
212frank wrote:you are not alone in that regard. thankfully, the printing presses churned on.....
212frank wrote:jtsound wrote:212frank wrote:Why is it so hard to understand? you and the flaming pink a-hole keep trying to say that there is some sort of vast voter repudiation of republicans when the difference between winning and losing is 2.52%. If you convert that to odds and apply it to the brain power you are demonstrating, its a 40:1 shot you and the a-hole will grasp this basic concept.
First of all, don't lump me in with the Buckster.
Second, that's not what I said.
Third, what is your point? Is a 2.5% margin not a legitimate win in your mind? Not big enough? Bush LOST the popular vote in 2000 but didn't have a problem starting 2 wars and enacting unfunded tax cuts that on both counts could be argued went a long way towards getting us into the deficit situation we are in at the moment. His margin in 2004 was less than Obama's 2.5 this year. So does that make his agenda and presidency less legitimate in your mind? Unlike the Buckster I'm not trying to pick a fight with you I just am trying to make some sense out of your problem with his margin of victory. It's a non-issue to everyone but you (and Bucky).
I do not have a problem with the margin of victory, only with how it is being represented. Obama won by a thin margin yet I keep reading about this giant repudiation of the loser. There is none. it was a super close election and means only that we are a hugely divided country with vastly different opinions on how to fix things or even what things need fixing. Yet the problems are straightforward and neither party has an answer. The only reason I default to Romney is because he at least pays lip service to the insane fiscal crisis looming over the country. I knew he wouldnt do anything more than obama but if you are gonna fuck me at least give the reacharound.
yellow ed wrote:bucky starburst wrote:So Sweet wrote:I would personally like to thank all of you for not going near the term "reach across the aisle"
Bucky if it makes you feel better I probably took 2.4% of Franks wealth in free drinks and other riders during the Continental days.
Excellent! I salute your liver and your thievery. I guess I do owe frank some gratitude. The Continental got me laid. More than once in fact, with a very attractive woman who had no communicable diseases. Thanks frank!!!! I miss those crazy goth witches and their pale undead allure. Where do they hang out now???
She's still partying in that big hole in the ground at 212 Franklin.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest